kchrisman

Entries by Katie Chrisman

Get Those Kids a Job: The Tax Advantages of Securing Summer Jobs for Your Children

Children who are dependents of their parents are subject to what is commonly referred to as the kiddie tax. This generally applies to children under the age of 19 and full-time students over the age of 18 and under the age of 24.The kiddie tax originated many years ago as a means to close …

Children who are dependents of their parents are subject to what is commonly referred to as the kiddie tax. This generally applies to children under the age of 19 and full-time students over the age of 18 and under the age of 24.

The kiddie tax originated many years ago as a means to close a tax loophole where parents would put their investments under their child’s name and social security number so that their investment income would be taxed at lower tax rates. Enter the kiddie tax, under which unearned income (investment income) more than a minimum amount is taxed at the parent’s highest marginal tax rate.

Tax-Free Income – On the bright side, a child’s earned income (income from working) is taxed at single rates, and the standard deduction for singles is $14,600 for 2024. This means that your child can make $14,600 from working and pay no income tax (but will be subject to Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes), and if the child is willing to contribute to a traditional IRA, for which the 2024 contribution cap is $7,000, the child can make $21,600 from working—federal income tax free.

Even if your child is reluctant to give up any of their hard-earned money from their summer or regular employment, if you, a grandparent, or others have the financial resources, the amount of an IRA contribution could be gifted to the child, giving your child a great start toward their retirement savings and hopefully a continuing incentive to save for their retirement.

Employing Your Child – If you are self-employed (an unincorporated business), a reasonable salary paid to your child reduces your self-employment (SE) income and your income tax by shifting income to the child.

For 2024, when a child under the age of 19 or a student under the age of 24 is claimed as a dependent of the parents, the child is generally subject to the kiddie tax rules if their investment income is upward of $2,600. Under these rules, the child’s investment income is taxed at the same rate as the parent’s top marginal rate using a lower $1,300 standard deduction. However, earned income (income from working) is taxed at the child’s marginal rate, and the earned income is reduced by the lesser of the earned income plus $400 or the regular standard deduction for the year, which is $14,600. If a child has no other income, the child could be paid $14,600 and incur no income tax. If the child is paid more, the next $11,600 he or she earns is taxed at 10%.

Example: You are in the 22% tax bracket and own an unincorporated business. You hire your child (who has no investment income) and pay the child $16,500 for the year. You reduce your income by $16,500, which saves you $3,630 of income tax (22% of $16,500), and your child has a taxable income of $1,900 ($16,500 less the $14,600 standard deduction) on which the tax is $190 (10% of $1,900). The net income tax saved by the family is $3,440 ($3,630 – $190).

If the business is unincorporated and the wages are paid to a child under age 18, he or she will not be subject to FICA – Social Security and Hospital Insurance (HI, aka Medicare) – taxes since employment for FICA tax purposes doesn’t include services performed by a child under the age of 18 while employed by a parent. Thus, the child will not be required to pay the employee’s share of the FICA taxes, and the business won’t have to pay its half either. In addition, by paying the child and thus reducing the business’s net income, the parent’s self-employment tax payable on net self-employment income is also reduced.

Example: Using the same circumstances as the example from above, and assuming your business profits are $180,000, by paying your child $16,500, you not only reduce your self-employment income for income tax purposes, but you also reduce your self-employment tax (HI portion) by $442 (2.9% of $16,500 times the SE factor of 92.35%). But if your net profits for the year were less than the maximum SE income ($168,600 for 2024) that is subject to Social Security tax, then the savings would include the 12.4% Social Security portion, $1,889 (12.4% of $16,500 x 92.35%), in addition to the 2.9% HI portion for a total savings of $2,331 ($442 + $1,889).

A similar but more liberal exemption applies for FUTA, which exempts from federal unemployment tax the earnings paid to a child under age 21 while employed by their parent. The FICA and FUTA exemptions also apply if a child is employed by a partnership consisting solely of the child’s parents. However, the exemptions do not apply to businesses that are incorporated or a partnership that includes non-parent partners. Even so, there’s no extra cost to your business if you’re paying a child for work that you would pay someone else to do anyway.

Retirement Plan Savings – Additional savings are possible if the child is paid more and deposits the extra earnings into a traditional IRA. For 2024, the child can make a tax-deductible contribution of up to $7,000 to his or her own IRA. The business also may be able to provide the child with retirement plan benefits, depending on the type of plan it uses and its terms, the child’s age, and the number of hours worked. By combining the standard deduction of $14,600 and the maximum deductible IRA contribution of $7,000 for 2024, a child could earn $21,600 of wages and pay no income tax.

However, referring back to our original example, the child’s tax to be saved by making a $7,000 traditional IRA contribution is only $190, so it might be appropriate to make a Roth IRA contribution instead, especially since the child has so many years before retirement and the future tax-free retirement benefits will far outweigh the current $190 savings.

If you have questions about the information provided here and other possible tax benefits or issues related to hiring your child, please give one of our offices a call.

Farm Tax Deductions and Planning Strategies for 2024

As the harvest season winds down and you plan for the coming year, optimizing your tax strategies should be a key focus. By leveraging specific farm tax deductions, you can significantly reduce your taxable income and preserve working capital.

Key Considerations for Effective Tax Planning

Business Classification: Ensure your farm qualifies as a business for tax …

Digital Acreage Reporting is Here

USDA Modernizes Acreage Reporting with Electronic Submissions

Nebraska farmer Quentin Connealy has ditched traditional paper maps and crayons for a more efficient digital system to file his mandatory acreage reports for crop insurance and the Farm Services Agency (FSA). This shift to electronic submissions not only saves time but also reduces costs and improves accuracy.

Embracing …

Exciting News for Michigan Blueberry Growers: Enhanced Crop Insurance Options Announced

Great news for Michigan blueberry farmers! The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has unveiled improved crop insurance options, set to provide substantial benefits to blueberry growers in the state.

Currently, Michigan is one of the largest blueberry producers in the U.S., supplying millions of pounds each year. However, the existing one-size-fits-all insurance model has not …

Meet Our Newest Team Members

At De Boer, Baumann & Company, we’re thrilled to introduce our latest additions to the family! Each new team member brings a unique set of skills and experiences that enrich our team dynamic and strengthen our commitment to excellence. Without further ado, let’s meet them: Madelynn Juries Position: Staff Location: Holland …

At De Boer, Baumann & Company, we’re thrilled to introduce our latest additions to the family! Each new team member brings a unique set of skills and experiences that enrich our team dynamic and strengthen our commitment to excellence. Without further ado, let’s meet them:

  1. Madelynn Juries

    • Position: Staff
    • Location: Holland office
  2. Carlina Schipper

    • Position: Staff
    • Location: Holland office
  3. Alycia Yeomans

    • Position: Staff
    • Location: Grand Haven office
  4. Noah Wittkopp

    • Position: Senior Staff
    • Location: Grand Haven office
  5. Sara Knight

    • Position: Office Administrator
    • Location: Grand Haven office

These talented individuals bring fresh perspectives and energy to our team, contributing to our collective success and growth. We’re excited to see the positive impact they’ll make as they embark on their journey with us.

Stay tuned for more updates and insights from our ever-expanding team!

Should You Put Out a Statement?

The decision to issue a public statement in response to a major news event can be daunting for nonprofit communication professionals, especially when internal disagreements run deep. With divisive issues increasingly dominating headlines and the looming specter of the 2024 presidential election, organizations must navigate these challenges with clarity and intentionality. Internal Clarity Matters …

The decision to issue a public statement in response to a major news event can be daunting for nonprofit communication professionals, especially when internal disagreements run deep. With divisive issues increasingly dominating headlines and the looming specter of the 2024 presidential election, organizations must navigate these challenges with clarity and intentionality.

Internal Clarity Matters

Before crafting a response, organizations must first establish clarity internally. This involves defining the organization’s stance on the issue at hand, understanding the tolerance range for differing viewpoints, and developing an advocacy strategy. These elements are interrelated but distinct, requiring careful consideration to avoid confusion and circular discussions.

Stance, Tolerance Range, and Advocacy Strategy

Every organization holds a stance on issues, whether explicit or implicit. Additionally, organizations have a tolerance range that delineates acceptable variations of opinion both internally and externally. Finally, organizations must deliberate on their advocacy strategy, determining how and when to engage with the issue at hand. Crafting a deliberate strategy ensures that responses are purposeful and aligned with organizational values.

Normalize Ideological Diversity

To foster productive dialogue amidst ideological differences, organizations must prioritize building a culture of respect and understanding. This requires intentional efforts to promote open-mindedness, empathy, and constructive discourse within the workplace. By practicing respectful engagement across diverse perspectives, organizations can navigate contentious issues with integrity and resilience.

In a landscape fraught with political tensions and societal upheaval, the ability to navigate controversy is essential for nonprofit communication professionals. By fostering internal clarity and embracing ideological diversity, organizations can effectively communicate their values while maintaining cohesion and purpose.

To learn more about how your organization can strategize over responding to polarizing world events, click here.

Anti-DEI Lawsuits Threaten Nonprofits

As the landscape of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives evolves, nonprofits and philanthropies are facing a new wave of legal challenges. These lawsuits, spearheaded by conservative activists, aim to dismantle race-conscious practices across various institutional realms. The implications are profound, posing existential questions for organizations striving to balance their missions with legal risks. …

As the landscape of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives evolves, nonprofits and philanthropies are facing a new wave of legal challenges. These lawsuits, spearheaded by conservative activists, aim to dismantle race-conscious practices across various institutional realms. The implications are profound, posing existential questions for organizations striving to balance their missions with legal risks.

The Shift in Legal Terrain

Following a 2023 Supreme Court ruling ending affirmative action in higher education, legal scrutiny has extended beyond academia to corporate diversity initiatives and now to the nonprofit and philanthropic sectors. Lawsuits targeting race-informed grantmaking processes, like those against Fearless Fund and Hidden Star, underscore a broader effort to challenge DEI measures in institutional practices and decision-making.

The Stakes for Nonprofits and Philanthropies

Legal battles are not just financially burdensome but also risk tarnishing an organization’s reputation in the media. Even organizations with strong legal footing face the dilemma of engaging in costly litigation and potentially exposing sensitive internal matters during the discovery process. As Ann O’Leary of Jenner & Block notes, many organizations grapple with the choice between standing firm on principle or capitulating to avoid legal entanglements.

Strategies for Mitigation

Amidst the uncertainty, proactive measures can help organizations navigate potential legal challenges. Conducting internal risk assessments and revisiting policies to mitigate vulnerabilities are crucial steps. Some may opt to refocus grantmaking efforts on economic disadvantage rather than race, though this shift may compromise the core mission of supporting marginalized communities. Ultimately, understanding and addressing these legal threats is imperative for the nonprofit sector’s resilience and efficacy in advancing DEI goals.

As legal battles persist and continue to evolve, nonprofits and philanthropies must remain vigilant, adapting strategies to safeguard their DEI efforts while upholding their missions of social justice and inclusion.

Click here to read more about what your organization can do to prepare for potential litigation.

Ten Nonprofit Funding Models

In the nonprofit sector, discussions about money are constant, with leaders often grappling with questions about how much funding they need, where to find it, and why there isn’t more available. Especially in challenging economic climates, these concerns become even more urgent. Unfortunately, clear answers to these questions are often elusive. Nonprofit leaders tend …

In the nonprofit sector, discussions about money are constant, with leaders often grappling with questions about how much funding they need, where to find it, and why there isn’t more available. Especially in challenging economic climates, these concerns become even more urgent. Unfortunately, clear answers to these questions are often elusive. Nonprofit leaders tend to excel in program creation but struggle with funding their organizations effectively. Similarly, philanthropists may find it challenging to grasp the full impact and limitations of their donations.

This lack of financial clarity has significant consequences. When funding sources and nonprofits are not well-aligned, resources may not flow to areas where they could have the most significant impact. This can result in promising programs being cut, scaled back, or never launched at all. Moreover, when financial resources are scarce, organizations often find themselves in chaotic fundraising scrambles.

In contrast to the nonprofit world, the for-profit sector typically exhibits a higher degree of financial clarity, often articulated through business models. These models provide shorthand for understanding how different businesses operate and their strategies for success. Investors and executives can engage in sophisticated conversations about a company’s approach based on these models, enhancing the likelihood of success and profitability.

However, the nonprofit sector lacks similarly clear and succinct conversations about long-term funding strategies. The various types of funding available to nonprofits have never been clearly defined, leading to a lack of understanding and clear thinking.

Through research, ten nonprofit models commonly used by large nonprofits in the United States have been identified. Rather than prescribing a single approach, the goal is to help nonprofit leaders articulate their organization’s models more clearly. This understanding can then be used to assess the potential and constraints associated with each model, ultimately supporting organizational growth.

For more information on these 10 nonprofit funding models, click here to read the full article.

The Cost of Going Green for Nonprofits

In today’s landscape, the shift towards eco-conscious practices is palpable across all sectors, including nonprofits. From embracing digital alternatives to reducing carbon footprints, organizations are increasingly under pressure to demonstrate environmental responsibility. Yet, amidst the push for sustainability, questions arise: What are the implications for nonprofits, and how can they make this transition without …

In today’s landscape, the shift towards eco-conscious practices is palpable across all sectors, including nonprofits. From embracing digital alternatives to reducing carbon footprints, organizations are increasingly under pressure to demonstrate environmental responsibility. Yet, amidst the push for sustainability, questions arise: What are the implications for nonprofits, and how can they make this transition without succumbing to greenwashing?

Growing Public Concerns

As environmental consciousness permeates consumer behavior, donors are scrutinizing nonprofits’ environmental stances. The rise of the eco-friendly donor underscores the importance of sustainability in organizational ethos. Studies reveal a significant portion of donors prioritizing sustainability in their contributions, signaling a seismic shift in charitable giving trends.

Actions and Their Costs

Even for nonprofits not inherently focused on environmental causes, adopting green practices is not only feasible but imperative. Simple steps, like eliminating paper waste or transitioning to virtual platforms, can yield substantial environmental benefits while enhancing operational efficiency. However, such transitions may entail initial financial investments.

Going Green Online

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the transition to online platforms, reshaping fundraising landscapes. Embracing digital fundraising not only ensures organizational resilience but also aligns with environmentally conscious practices. Additionally, remote work arrangements reduce carbon emissions and promote inclusivity, catering to diverse workforce needs.

Combatting Greenwashing

In an era of heightened environmental awareness, stakeholders are increasingly vigilant against greenwashing tactics. Genuine engagement with local environmental initiatives and transparent communication are essential in building credibility and trust. For nonprofits, aligning with authentic environmental causes reinforces their societal value and fosters community goodwill.

While the journey towards sustainability may pose financial challenges, nonprofits cannot afford to ignore the environmental imperative. Embracing green practices not only aligns with donor expectations but also reinforces organizational integrity. As stewards of public trust, nonprofits must navigate the green transition with diligence, recognizing its profound impact on both mission delivery and community engagement.

For more information on the cost of going green, click here to read the full article.

USDA Proposes Farmer Incentives to Amplify Biobased Product Growth

A recent USDA report indicates that the United States has a strong potential to convert its abundant biomass supply into biobased products, provided that improvements are made to supply chains and materials handling, and farmers are incentivized to produce biomass while minimizing risk.

The USDA has unveiled its strategy for enhancing domestic biobased product manufacturing, …